
W
Preço de Wormhole
$0,083610
-$0,00434
(-4,94%)
Alteração de preço nas últimas 24 horas

Como se sente hoje relativamente à W?
Partilhe as suas opiniões aqui ao dar um <i>thumbs up</i> caso se sinta <i>bullish</i> em relação à moeda ou <i>thumbs down</i> caso se sinta <i>bearish</i>.
Vote para ver os resultados
Informações do mercado de Wormhole
Capitalização do mercado
A capitalização do mercado é calculada ao multiplicar a oferta em circulação de uma moeda pelo último preço da mesma.
Capitalização do mercado = Oferta em circulação × Último preço
Capitalização do mercado = Oferta em circulação × Último preço
Oferta em circulação
O montante total de uma moeda que está disponível no mercado.
Classificação da capitalização de mercado
A classificação de uma moeda no que diz respeito ao valor da capitalização do mercado.
Máximo histórico
O preço mais elevado que uma moeda atingiu no seu histórico de trading.
Mínimo histórico
O preço mais baixo que uma moeda atingiu no seu histórico de trading.
Capitalização do mercado
$245,53M
Oferta em circulação
2 927 456 026 W
29,27% de
10 000 000 000 W
Classificação da capitalização de mercado
--
Auditorias

Última auditoria: 9/03/2023
Máximo em 24h
$0,088000
Mínimo em 24h
$0,082580
Máximo histórico
$1,8200
-95,41% (-$1,7364)
Última atualização: 3/04/2024
Mínimo histórico
$0,076000
+10,01% (+$0,0076100)
Última atualização: 11/03/2025
Calculadora de W


Desempenho do preço de Wormhole em USD
O preço atual de Wormhole é $0,083610. Ao longo das últimas 24 horas, o Wormhole diminuiu -4,93%. Atualmente, tem uma oferta em circulação de 2 927 456 026 W e uma oferta máxima de 10 000 000 000 W, o que resulta numa capitalização de mercado totalmente diluída de $245,53M. De momento, a moeda Wormhole ocupa a posição 0 na classificação de capitalização do mercado. O preço de Wormhole/USD é atualizado em tempo real.
Hoje
-$0,00434
-4,94%
7 dias
-$0,03584
-30,01%
30 dias
-$0,05619
-40,20%
3 meses
-$0,20999
-71,53%
Conversões de Wormhole populares
Última atualização: 30/03/2025, 21:49
1 W em USD | 0,083870 $ |
1 W em EUR | 0,077118 € |
1 W em PHP | 4,8116 ₱ |
1 W em IDR | 1391,80 Rp |
1 W em GBP | 0,064787 £ |
1 W em CAD | 0,12062 $ |
1 W em AED | 0,30805 AED |
1 W em VND | 2145,01 ₫ |
Sobre Wormhole (W)
A classificação fornecida é uma classificação agregada recolhida pela OKX a partir das fontes fornecidas e destina-se apenas a fins informativos. A OKX não garante a qualidade ou a exatidão das classificações. Não visa fornecer (i) aconselhamento ou recomendações de investimento; (ii) uma oferta ou solicitação para comprar, vender ou deter ativos digitais; ou (iii) aconselhamento financeiro, contabilístico, jurídico ou fiscal. Os ativos digitais, incluindo criptomoedas estáveis e NFTs, envolvem um elevado grau de risco, podem ter grandes flutuações e podem, inclusivamente, perder todo o valor. O preço e o desempenho dos ativos digitais não são garantidos e podem mudar sem aviso. Os seus ativos digitais não estão cobertos por seguro contra eventuais perdas. Os ganhos históricos não são indicativos de ganhos futuros. A OKX não garante quaisquer ganhos nem a amortização do capital ou dos juros. A OKX não fornece recomendações de investimento ou de ativos. Deve ponderar cuidadosamente se transacionar ou deter ativos digitais vai ao encontro da sua condição financeira. Informe-se junto do seu consultor jurídico/fiscal/de investimentos para esclarecer questões relativas às suas circunstâncias específicas.
Mostrar mais
- Site oficial
- Documento técnico
- Github
- Explorador de blocos
Acerca dos sites de terceiros
Acerca dos sites de terceiros
Ao utilizar o site de terceiros ("TPW"), aceita que qualquer utilização do TPW está sujeita e será regida pelos termos do TPW. Salvo indicação expressa por escrito, a OKX e os seus afiliados ("OKX") não estão, de forma alguma, associados ao proprietário ou operador do TPW. Concorda que a OKX não é responsável nem imputável por quaisquer perdas, danos e outras consequências que advenham da sua utilização do TPW. Tenha presente que utilizar um TPW poderá resultar na perda ou diminuição dos seus ativos.
Perguntas frequentes sobre Wormhole
Quanto vale 1 Wormhole hoje?
Atualmente, um Wormhole vale $0,083610. Para obter respostas e informações sobre a ação do preço de Wormhole, está no sítio certo. Explore os gráficos Wormhole mais recentes e transacione de forma responsável com a OKX.
O que são as criptomoedas?
As criptomoedas, como Wormhole, são ativos digitais que operam num livro-razão público chamado blockchain. Saiba mais sobre as moedas e os tokens disponibilizados na OKX e os respetivos atributos diferentes, que inclui preços em direto e gráficos em tempo real.
Quando foram inventadas as criptomoedas?
Graças à crise financeira de 2008, o interesse em finanças descentralizadas aumentou. A Bitcoin proporcionou uma nova solução ao ser um ativo digital seguro numa rede descentralizada. Desde então, têm sido criados muitos outros tokens, como Wormhole.
O preço da Wormhole vai subir hoje?
Veja a nossa Página de previsão do preço de Wormhole para prever preços futuros e determinar os seus preços-alvo.
Divulgação ASG
Os regulamentos ASG (ambientais, sociais e de governação) para criptoativos visam abordar o seu impacto ambiental (por exemplo, mineração intensiva em termos de energia), promover a transparência e garantir práticas de governação éticas para alinhar a indústria das criptomoedas com objetivos sociais e de sustentabilidade mais amplos. Estes regulamentos incentivam a conformidade com normas que mitigam riscos e promovem a confiança nos ativos digitais.
Detalhes do ativo
Nome
OKcoin Europe LTD
Identificador de entidade jurídica relevante
54930069NLWEIGLHXU42
Nome do criptoativo
Wormhole Token
Mecanismo de consenso
Wormhole Token is present on the following networks: arbitrum, ethereum, optimism, solana.
Arbitrum is a Layer 2 solution on top of Ethereum that uses Optimistic Rollups to enhance scalability and reduce transaction costs. It assumes that transactions are valid by default and only verifies them if there's a challenge (optimistic): Core Components: • Sequencer: Orders transactions and creates batches for processing. • Bridge: Facilitates asset transfers between Arbitrum and Ethereum. • Fraud Proofs: Protect against invalid transactions through an interactive verification process. Verification Process: 1. Transaction Submission: Users submit transactions to the Arbitrum Sequencer, which orders and batches them. 2. State Commitment: These batches are submitted to Ethereum with a state commitment. 3. Challenge Period: Validators have a specific period to challenge the state if they suspect fraud. 4. Dispute Resolution: If a challenge occurs, the dispute is resolved through an iterative process to identify the fraudulent transaction. The final operation is executed on Ethereum to determine the correct state. 5. Rollback and Penalties: If fraud is proven, the state is rolled back, and the dishonest party is penalized. Security and Efficiency: The combination of the Sequencer, bridge, and interactive fraud proofs ensures that the system remains secure and efficient. By minimizing on-chain data and leveraging off-chain computations, Arbitrum can provide high throughput and low fees.
The Ethereum network uses a Proof-of-Stake Consensus Mechanism to validate new transactions on the blockchain. Core Components 1. Validators: Validators are responsible for proposing and validating new blocks. To become a validator, a user must deposit (stake) 32 ETH into a smart contract. This stake acts as collateral and can be slashed if the validator behaves dishonestly. 2. Beacon Chain: The Beacon Chain is the backbone of Ethereum 2.0. It coordinates the network of validators and manages the consensus protocol. It is responsible for creating new blocks, organizing validators into committees, and implementing the finality of blocks. Consensus Process 1. Block Proposal: Validators are chosen randomly to propose new blocks. This selection is based on a weighted random function (WRF), where the weight is determined by the amount of ETH staked. 2. Attestation: Validators not proposing a block participate in attestation. They attest to the validity of the proposed block by voting for it. Attestations are then aggregated to form a single proof of the block’s validity. 3. Committees: Validators are organized into committees to streamline the validation process. Each committee is responsible for validating blocks within a specific shard or the Beacon Chain itself. This ensures decentralization and security, as a smaller group of validators can quickly reach consensus. 4. Finality: Ethereum 2.0 uses a mechanism called Casper FFG (Friendly Finality Gadget) to achieve finality. Finality means that a block and its transactions are considered irreversible and confirmed. Validators vote on the finality of blocks, and once a supermajority is reached, the block is finalized. 5. Incentives and Penalties: Validators earn rewards for participating in the network, including proposing blocks and attesting to their validity. Conversely, validators can be penalized (slashed) for malicious behavior, such as double-signing or being offline for extended periods. This ensures honest participation and network security.
Optimism is a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum that uses Optimistic Rollups to increase transaction throughput and reduce costs while inheriting the security of the Ethereum main chain. Core Components 1. Optimistic Rollups: Rollup Blocks: Transactions are batched into rollup blocks and processed off-chain. State Commitments: The state of these transactions is periodically committed to the Ethereum main chain. 2. Sequencers: Transaction Ordering: Sequencers are responsible for ordering transactions and creating batches. State Updates: Sequencers update the state of the rollup and submit these updates to the Ethereum main chain. Block Production: They construct and execute Layer 2 blocks, which are then posted to Ethereum. 3. Fraud Proofs: Assumption of Validity: Transactions are assumed to be valid by default. Challenge Period: A specific time window during which anyone can challenge a transaction by submitting a fraud proof. Dispute Resolution: If a transaction is challenged, an interactive verification game is played to determine its validity. If fraud is detected, the invalid state is rolled back, and the dishonest participant is penalized. Consensus Process 1. Transaction Submission: Users submit transactions to the sequencer, which orders them into batches. 2. Batch Processing: The sequencer processes these transactions off-chain, updating the Layer 2 state. 3. State Commitment: The updated state and the batch of transactions are periodically committed to the Ethereum main chain. This is done by posting the state root (a cryptographic hash representing the state) and transaction data as calldata on Ethereum. 4. Fraud Proofs and Challenges: Once a batch is posted, there is a challenge period during which anyone can submit a fraud proof if they believe a transaction is invalid. Interactive Verification: The dispute is resolved through an interactive verification game, which involves breaking down the transaction into smaller steps to identify the exact point of fraud. Rollbacks and Penalties: If fraud is proven, the batch is rolled back, and the dishonest actor loses their staked collateral as a penalty. 5. Finality: After the challenge period, if no fraud proof is submitted, the batch is considered final. This means the transactions are accepted as valid, and the state updates are permanent.
Solana uses a unique combination of Proof of History (PoH) and Proof of Stake (PoS) to achieve high throughput, low latency, and robust security. Here’s a detailed explanation of how these mechanisms work: Core Concepts 1. Proof of History (PoH): Time-Stamped Transactions: PoH is a cryptographic technique that timestamps transactions, creating a historical record that proves that an event has occurred at a specific moment in time. Verifiable Delay Function: PoH uses a Verifiable Delay Function (VDF) to generate a unique hash that includes the transaction and the time it was processed. This sequence of hashes provides a verifiable order of events, enabling the network to efficiently agree on the sequence of transactions. 2. Proof of Stake (PoS): Validator Selection: Validators are chosen to produce new blocks based on the number of SOL tokens they have staked. The more tokens staked, the higher the chance of being selected to validate transactions and produce new blocks. Delegation: Token holders can delegate their SOL tokens to validators, earning rewards proportional to their stake while enhancing the network's security. Consensus Process 1. Transaction Validation: Transactions are broadcast to the network and collected by validators. Each transaction is validated to ensure it meets the network’s criteria, such as having correct signatures and sufficient funds. 2. PoH Sequence Generation: A validator generates a sequence of hashes using PoH, each containing a timestamp and the previous hash. This process creates a historical record of transactions, establishing a cryptographic clock for the network. 3. Block Production: The network uses PoS to select a leader validator based on their stake. The leader is responsible for bundling the validated transactions into a block. The leader validator uses the PoH sequence to order transactions within the block, ensuring that all transactions are processed in the correct order. 4. Consensus and Finalization: Other validators verify the block produced by the leader validator. They check the correctness of the PoH sequence and validate the transactions within the block. Once the block is verified, it is added to the blockchain. Validators sign off on the block, and it is considered finalized. Security and Economic Incentives 1. Incentives for Validators: Block Rewards: Validators earn rewards for producing and validating blocks. These rewards are distributed in SOL tokens and are proportional to the validator’s stake and performance. Transaction Fees: Validators also earn transaction fees from the transactions included in the blocks they produce. These fees provide an additional incentive for validators to process transactions efficiently. 2. Security: Staking: Validators must stake SOL tokens to participate in the consensus process. This staking acts as collateral, incentivizing validators to act honestly. If a validator behaves maliciously or fails to perform, they risk losing their staked tokens. Delegated Staking: Token holders can delegate their SOL tokens to validators, enhancing network security and decentralization. Delegators share in the rewards and are incentivized to choose reliable validators. 3. Economic Penalties: Slashing: Validators can be penalized for malicious behavior, such as double-signing or producing invalid blocks. This penalty, known as slashing, results in the loss of a portion of the staked tokens, discouraging dishonest actions.
Mecanismos de incentivo e taxas aplicáveis
Wormhole Token is present on the following networks: arbitrum, ethereum, optimism, solana.
Arbitrum One, a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, employs several incentive mechanisms to ensure the security and integrity of transactions on its network. The key mechanisms include: 1. Validators and Sequencers: o Sequencers are responsible for ordering transactions and creating batches that are processed off-chain. They play a critical role in maintaining the efficiency and throughput of the network. o Validators monitor the sequencers' actions and ensure that transactions are processed correctly. Validators verify the state transitions and ensure that no invalid transactions are included in the batches. 2. Fraud Proofs: o Assumption of Validity: Transactions processed off-chain are assumed to be valid. This allows for quick transaction finality and high throughput. o Challenge Period: There is a predefined period during which anyone can challenge the validity of a transaction by submitting a fraud proof. This mechanism acts as a deterrent against malicious behavior. o Dispute Resolution: If a challenge is raised, an interactive verification process is initiated to pinpoint the exact step where fraud occurred. If the challenge is valid, the fraudulent transaction is reverted, and the dishonest actor is penalized. 3. Economic Incentives: o Rewards for Honest Behavior: Participants in the network, such as validators and sequencers, are incentivized through rewards for performing their duties honestly and efficiently. These rewards come from transaction fees and potentially other protocol incentives. o Penalties for Malicious Behavior: Participants who engage in dishonest behavior or submit invalid transactions are penalized. This can include slashing of staked tokens or other forms of economic penalties, which serve to discourage malicious actions. Fees on the Arbitrum One Blockchain 1. Transaction Fees: o Layer 2 Fees: Users pay fees for transactions processed on the Layer 2 network. These fees are typically lower than Ethereum mainnet fees due to the reduced computational load on the main chain. o Arbitrum Transaction Fee: A fee is charged for each transaction processed by the sequencer. This fee covers the cost of processing the transaction and ensuring its inclusion in a batch. 2. L1 Data Fees: o Posting Batches to Ethereum: Periodically, the state updates from the Layer 2 transactions are posted to the Ethereum mainnet as calldata. This involves a fee, known as the L1 data fee, which accounts for the gas required to publish these state updates on Ethereum. o Cost Sharing: Because transactions are batched, the fixed costs of posting state updates to Ethereum are spread across multiple transactions, making it more cost-effective for users.
Ethereum, particularly after transitioning to Ethereum 2.0 (Eth2), employs a Proof-of-Stake (PoS) consensus mechanism to secure its network. The incentives for validators and the fee structures play crucial roles in maintaining the security and efficiency of the blockchain. Incentive Mechanisms 1. Staking Rewards: Validator Rewards: Validators are essential to the PoS mechanism. They are responsible for proposing and validating new blocks. To participate, they must stake a minimum of 32 ETH. In return, they earn rewards for their contributions, which are paid out in ETH. These rewards are a combination of newly minted ETH and transaction fees from the blocks they validate. Reward Rate: The reward rate for validators is dynamic and depends on the total amount of ETH staked in the network. The more ETH staked, the lower the individual reward rate, and vice versa. This is designed to balance the network's security and the incentive to participate. 2. Transaction Fees: Base Fee: After the implementation of Ethereum Improvement Proposal (EIP) 1559, the transaction fee model changed to include a base fee that is burned (i.e., removed from circulation). This base fee adjusts dynamically based on network demand, aiming to stabilize transaction fees and reduce volatility. Priority Fee (Tip): Users can also include a priority fee (tip) to incentivize validators to include their transactions more quickly. This fee goes directly to the validators, providing them with an additional incentive to process transactions efficiently. 3. Penalties for Malicious Behavior: Slashing: Validators face penalties (slashing) if they engage in malicious behavior, such as double-signing or validating incorrect information. Slashing results in the loss of a portion of their staked ETH, discouraging bad actors and ensuring that validators act in the network's best interest. Inactivity Penalties: Validators also face penalties for prolonged inactivity. This ensures that validators remain active and engaged in maintaining the network's security and operation. Fees Applicable on the Ethereum Blockchain 1. Gas Fees: Calculation: Gas fees are calculated based on the computational complexity of transactions and smart contract executions. Each operation on the Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM) has an associated gas cost. Dynamic Adjustment: The base fee introduced by EIP-1559 dynamically adjusts according to network congestion. When demand for block space is high, the base fee increases, and when demand is low, it decreases. 2. Smart Contract Fees: Deployment and Interaction: Deploying a smart contract on Ethereum involves paying gas fees proportional to the contract's complexity and size. Interacting with deployed smart contracts (e.g., executing functions, transferring tokens) also incurs gas fees. Optimizations: Developers are incentivized to optimize their smart contracts to minimize gas usage, making transactions more cost-effective for users. 3. Asset Transfer Fees: Token Transfers: Transferring ERC-20 or other token standards involves gas fees. These fees vary based on the token's contract implementation and the current network demand.
Optimism, an Ethereum Layer 2 scaling solution, uses Optimistic Rollups to increase transaction throughput and reduce costs while maintaining security and decentralization. Here's an in-depth look at the incentive mechanisms and applicable fees within the Optimism protocol: Incentive Mechanisms 1. Sequencers: Transaction Ordering: Sequencers are responsible for ordering and batching transactions off-chain. They play a critical role in maintaining the efficiency and speed of the network. Economic Incentives: Sequencers earn transaction fees from users. These fees incentivize sequencers to process transactions quickly and accurately. 2. Validators and Fraud Proofs: Assumption of Validity: In Optimistic Rollups, transactions are assumed to be valid by default. This allows for quick transaction finality. Challenge Mechanism: Validators (or anyone) can challenge the validity of a transaction by submitting a fraud proof during a specified challenge period. This mechanism ensures that invalid transactions are detected and reverted. Challenge Rewards: Successful challengers are rewarded for identifying and proving fraudulent transactions. This incentivizes participants to actively monitor the network for invalid transactions, thereby enhancing security. 3. Economic Penalties: Fraud Proof Penalties: If a sequencer includes an invalid transaction and it is successfully challenged, they face economic penalties, such as losing a portion of their staked collateral. This discourages dishonest behavior. Inactivity and Misbehavior: Validators and sequencers are also incentivized to remain active and behave correctly, as inactivity or misbehavior can lead to penalties and loss of rewards. Fees Applicable on the Optimism Layer 2 Protocol 1. Transaction Fees: Layer 2 Transaction Fees: Users pay fees for transactions processed on the Layer 2 network. These fees are generally lower than Ethereum mainnet fees due to the reduced computational load on the main chain. Cost Efficiency: By batching multiple transactions into a single batch, Optimism reduces the overall cost per transaction, making it more economical for users. 2. L1 Data Fees: Posting Batches to Ethereum: Periodically, the state updates from Layer 2 transactions are posted to the Ethereum mainnet as calldata. This involves a fee known as the L1 data fee, which covers the gas cost of publishing these state updates on Ethereum. Cost Sharing: The fixed costs of posting state updates to Ethereum are spread across multiple transactions within a batch, reducing the cost burden on individual transactions. 3. Smart Contract Fees: Execution Costs: Fees for deploying and interacting with smart contracts on Optimism are based on the computational resources required. This ensures that users are charged proportionally for the resources they consume.
Solana uses a combination of Proof of History (PoH) and Proof of Stake (PoS) to secure its network and validate transactions. Here’s a detailed explanation of the incentive mechanisms and applicable fees: Incentive Mechanisms 4. Validators: Staking Rewards: Validators are chosen based on the number of SOL tokens they have staked. They earn rewards for producing and validating blocks, which are distributed in SOL. The more tokens staked, the higher the chances of being selected to validate transactions and produce new blocks. Transaction Fees: Validators earn a portion of the transaction fees paid by users for the transactions they include in the blocks. This provides an additional financial incentive for validators to process transactions efficiently and maintain the network's integrity. 5. Delegators: Delegated Staking: Token holders who do not wish to run a validator node can delegate their SOL tokens to a validator. In return, delegators share in the rewards earned by the validators. This encourages widespread participation in securing the network and ensures decentralization. 6. Economic Security: Slashing: Validators can be penalized for malicious behavior, such as producing invalid blocks or being frequently offline. This penalty, known as slashing, involves the loss of a portion of their staked tokens. Slashing deters dishonest actions and ensures that validators act in the best interest of the network. Opportunity Cost: By staking SOL tokens, validators and delegators lock up their tokens, which could otherwise be used or sold. This opportunity cost incentivizes participants to act honestly to earn rewards and avoid penalties. Fees Applicable on the Solana Blockchain 7. Transaction Fees: Low and Predictable Fees: Solana is designed to handle a high throughput of transactions, which helps keep fees low and predictable. The average transaction fee on Solana is significantly lower compared to other blockchains like Ethereum. Fee Structure: Fees are paid in SOL and are used to compensate validators for the resources they expend to process transactions. This includes computational power and network bandwidth. 8. Rent Fees: State Storage: Solana charges rent fees for storing data on the blockchain. These fees are designed to discourage inefficient use of state storage and encourage developers to clean up unused state. Rent fees help maintain the efficiency and performance of the network. 9. Smart Contract Fees: Execution Costs: Similar to transaction fees, fees for deploying and interacting with smart contracts on Solana are based on the computational resources required. This ensures that users are charged proportionally for the resources they consume.
Início do período ao qual a divulgação é relativa
2024-03-28
Fim do período ao qual a divulgação é relativa
2025-03-28
Relatório de energia
Consumo de energia
378.56598 (kWh/a)
Fontes de consumo de energia e metodologias
The energy consumption of this asset is aggregated across multiple components:
To determine the energy consumption of a token, the energy consumption of the network(s) solana, ethereum, optimism, arbitrum is calculated first. Based on the crypto asset's gas consumption per network, the share of the total consumption of the respective network that is assigned to this asset is defined. When calculating the energy consumption, we used - if available - the Functionally Fungible Group Digital Token Identifier (FFG DTI) to determine all implementations of the asset of question in scope and we update the mappings regulary, based on data of the Digital Token Identifier Foundation.
Aviso legal
Os conteúdos sociais nesta página ("Conteúdos"), que incluem, entre outros, os tweets e estatísticas fornecidos pela LunarCrush, provêm de terceiros e destinam-se a fins informativos conforme estão disponibilizados. A OKX não garante a qualidade ou a exatidão dos Conteúdos, sendo que os mesmos não representam as opiniões da OKX. Não visam fornecer (i) aconselhamento ou recomendações de investimento; (ii) uma oferta ou solicitação para comprar, vender ou deter ativos digitais; ou (iii) aconselhamento financeiro, contabilístico, jurídico ou fiscal. Os ativos digitais, incluindo criptomoedas estáveis e NFT, envolvem um elevado grau de risco e podem sofrer grandes flutuações. O preço e o desempenho dos ativos digitais não são garantidos e podem mudar sem aviso. A OKX não fornece recomendações de investimento ou de ativos. Deve ponderar cuidadosamente se transacionar ou deter ativos digitais vai ao encontro da sua condição financeira. Informe-se junto do seu consultor jurídico/fiscal/de investimentos para esclarecer questões relativas às suas circunstâncias específicas. Para obter mais detalhes, consulte os nossos Termos de Utilização e o Aviso de Risco. Ao utilizar o site de terceiros ("TPW"), aceita que qualquer utilização do TPW está sujeita e será regida pelos termos do TPW. Salvo indicação expressa por escrito, a OKX e os seus afiliados ("OKX") não estão, de forma alguma, associados ao proprietário ou operador do TPW. Concorda que a OKX não é responsável nem imputável por quaisquer perdas, danos e outras consequências que advenham da sua utilização do TPW. Tenha presente que utilizar um TPW poderá resultar na perda ou diminuição dos seus ativos. O produto pode não estar disponível em todas as jurisdições.
Calculadora de W


Redes sociais